British subjects, but that it will be sufficient if they take this oath of allegiance which is in fact similar & that required of Volunteers in England (see deg? & Straits in 16159/88) and to that required of the Police in Otting (sec 0.0 Sched. III. f 81887) who are not required to be British subjects.
? Inform W.O. that we propose to inform OAS. to that effect but first send papers to C.D.C. for observations.
Jing. 10 June 90
Maji Clauko
Run 12/6
Off. Opinion need not be naturalized and the procedure proposed in above minute should be followed.
Concurred by C.S.G. 15.7.90. Pati
17.7.90. Jo Jawat M. Braustin Gr. Marte
See note from W.O. herewith, asking that we should throw no difficulty in the way of naturalizing these Chinese.
500
The Attorney Gen. of Hongkong has, you will see, expressed Opinion that these Chinamen would hardly come under the phrase "person of colour" 0.95(2) of Army Act 1881 consider origin & history of that subsection
But surely their origin & history need not be considered, provided the words cover Chinamen. Doubtless that they do.
? Send Despatch to W.O. saying that Lord Knutsford is advised that naturalization is under 1.95(2) of Army Act 1881 and that his Lordship would hesitate to depart from the practice which has long prevailed at Hongkong only to naturalize individuals by special order, such Order only being passed in case of persons who are known or believed to have bona fide taken up their residence in Hongkong for good and that he proposes with W. Stanhope's concurrence inform Governor that the oath of allegiance required by s.d. the Police Ord. will suffice I then
British subjects, but that it will be sufficient if they take this outh of allegiance which is in fact sumilar & that required of Volunteers in England (see deg? & Straits in 16159/88) and to that required of
the Police in Otting (sec 0.0
Sched. III. f
81887)
who
Ord. 19
are not required to
be British subjects.
? Inform W.0. that we
propose
to inform OAS. to that affect
tout first send häfers &
C.D. C. for observations.
Jing. 10 June 90
Maji Clauko
Run 12/6
off. Opinion
med not be nationalize and the procedure propond in abon minute should be follond.
Canichend by C.8.6. 15.7.qu. Pati (he are
that the
that
17.7.90.
Jo
Jawat
M. Braustin
Gr. Marte
See note from W.O. herewith, asking
news m
to the unmist attaches this desp. ggs sen sosing
that we should throw no difficulty.
Ordinance for naturalizing
the way of
there Chinese.
500
this
The Attorney Gen. of Haughing has you will see expressed Opinio
that these (Misamen would hardly
come under the phrase
0.95(2) of
person of colour
Army Act 1881 consider
པ་
origin & history of that subsection But surely them rigun & history need not be considered, provided
and the words cover (hinamen, Doubmit that they do.
? Send Despresto W.O. saying that Lord Kuntsford is adviced that that naturalizatim is under 1.95(2) of amny
مفسيا
AA 188I
✓ that his
ecessary Lordship would hesitate to depart from the practice which has long prevailed at Hughing only to naturalize individuals by special order, such Order only being passed in case
f
persons who are known believed to have bona fide taken up their residence in Haything for food and that he proposes with W. Stanhope's concurrence inform forr. that the oath of allegiancs required by s.d thee Police Ord. will suffice I then
!
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.